We performed a longitudinal, retrospective cohort study involving adults 50 to 85 years of age who were included in the Health and Retirement Study and the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe between 2010 and 2022. Wealth quartiles were defined according to age group and country, with quartile 1 comprising the poorest participants and quartile 4 the wealthiest. Mortality and Kaplan–Meier curves were estimated for each wealth quartile across the United States and 16 countries in northern and western, southern, and eastern Europe. We used Cox proportional-hazards models that included adjustment for baseline covariates (age group, sex, marital status [ever or never married], educational level [any or no college education], residence [rural or nonrural], current smoking status [smoking or nonsmoking], and absence or presence of a previously diagnosed long-term condition) to quantify the association between wealth quartile and all-cause mortality from 2010 through 2022 (the primary outcome).

The volume-outcome relationship has been a commonly invoked policy initiative aimed at improving the quality of healthcare. This inverse relationship between the caseload volume of patients treated and patient mortality has been described across many health settings and in many countries. Despite the large body of literature demonstrating this favourable relationship, most studies have focused on differentiating the effects of selective referral and the true effects of volume. In comparison, there are few studies evaluating the underlying mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship, namely dynamic learning-by-doing or the static effect of economics of scale. Resolving this tension between policies that allow providers to accrue experience over time and policies that promote centralisation of services would make a more compelling argument for policies such as minimum volume standards to be firmly established.

In this retrospective study, between 2009 and 2021, avoidable mortality increased in all US states, primarily due to increases in preventable deaths, while it decreased in comparable high-income countries. Health spending was significantly negatively associated with avoidable mortality for other high-income countries but not across US states.

Americans have grown accustomed to direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertisements and the refrain, “If you think [this drug] is right for you, talk to your doctor.” But some recent online ads feature a new twist — a link to a clinician offering telehealth services. Several pharmaceutical companies have also launched online platforms that direct users to websites run by telehealth companies, where clinicians are available to prescribe medications after a virtual consultation.

Repeated Supreme Court cases suggest uninformed sterilization care is a persistent and contemporary issue in India. This article examines patient satisfaction ratings as a potential accountability mechanism to assess normalized forms of coercion. With a sample of over 180,000 sterilized women in India, it identifies a statistically significant relationship between exposure to coercive care and odds of reporting low quality. However, over 95 percent of women who underwent a tubal ligation procedure rated their care highly even when provided with inadequate information (a recognized form of coercion), with more pronounced discordance when a patient belonged to a historically marginalized caste. System-modifiable factors, such as conditional cash transfers (CCT) to the patient and postpartum procedure timing increased reporting discordance. Using a reproductive justice lens and building on Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach, this work examines how to identify human rights violations in the routine delivery of care.

Repeated Supreme Court cases suggest uninformed sterilization care is a persistent and contemporary issue in India. This article examines patient satisfaction ratings as a potential accountability mechanism to assess normalized forms of coercion. With a sample of over 180,000 sterilized women in India, it identifies a statistically significant relationship between exposure to coercive care and odds of reporting low quality. However, over 95 percent of women who underwent a tubal ligation procedure rated their care highly even when provided with inadequate information (a recognized form of coercion), with more pronounced discordance when a patient belonged to a historically marginalized caste. System-modifiable factors, such as conditional cash transfers (CCT) to the patient and postpartum procedure timing increased reporting discordance. Using a reproductive justice lens and building on Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach, this work examines how to identify human rights violations in the routine delivery of care.

The aim of this report from the Expert Group (see Box 1) on Health Systems Performance Assessment (HSPA) is to establish a comprehensive definition of low-value care in line with the concept of valuebased healthcare and from a health system perspective, and to identify low-value care indicators and measures to facilitate the reduction of low-value care for national HSPA practices. To achieve this aim, a “value-based healthcare” working group was established as a subgroup of the Expert Group with country representatives from Belgium, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Slovenia as well as the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the DirectorateGeneral for Health and Food Safety (DG SANTE)

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis but some patients exhibit a discrepancy between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient satisfaction (PS). This study aims to identify predictors for patients reporting unfavorable PROs but high PS and vice versa.

Patient harm remains an important concern in hospital care,1 urging a reprioritisation of patient safety and healthcare quality.2 The past 20 years have been characterised by indispensable quality developments,3 including accreditation and public reporting providing foundations for monitoring and promoting healthcare organisation performance.4 Yet, the quality progress appears unsustainable in the long term, as indicated by, for example, nosocomial infections rising in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic,5 6 or mortality reductions being abolished weeks after accreditation survey visits.7 A resilient safety culture with quality truly embedded into everyday practice can only occur after increased awareness of hospital-wide safety risks.3 8

In Belgium, the setting of this study, there is a lack of systematic hospital-wide quality monitoring, despite indications of important differences in patient outcomes between hospitals persisting over time.9 It has been shown for urology patients10 that outcomes such as mortality, readmissions and prolonged length of stay vary to a great extent between hospitals, largely impacting healthcare equity and patient safety.11 12 No data exist on variation in patient outcomes across all patient service lines and across multiple patient outcomes. By recognising which patient service lines are most prone to between-hospital variation and by identifying which hospitals have the highest potential for quality improvement (QI), targeted initiatives can be established. Such focused efforts are highly required in times of scarce financial and human resources and poor outcome prevalence.

The primary aim of this study was to examine inter-hospital variability in in-hospital mortality, unplanned 30-day readmissions and prolonged length of hospital stay (pLOS) across all Major Diagnostic Categories (MDCs) for all Belgian acute-care hospitals. Second, we aimed to estimate the number of outcomes potentially avoidable if successful QI policies could be established. Finally, we aimed to identify a set of high-impact-opportunity hospitals where policymakers can stimulate QI initiatives set to improve patient outcomes.

Health systems experience difficult trade-offs when paying for new drugs. In England, funding recommendations by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for new drugs might generate health gains but inevitably result in forgone health as the funds cannot be used for alternative treatments and services. We aimed to evaluate the population health impact of NICE recommendations for new drugs during 2000–20.

The Inflation Reduction Act instructs Medicare to negotiate prices of top-selling drugs and sets statutory upper limits (“ceilings”) on negotiated prices. Medicare can negotiate prices below the ceilings based on how prices and clinical benefits of these drugs compare with those of therapeutic alternatives. In August 2024, Medicare published the negotiated prices for the first 10 drugs selected for negotiation; these prices will come into effect in 2026 and will apply to all Medicare Part D plans. We analyzed how negotiated prices in the US compared with net prices before negotiation, ceiling prices, and list prices in 6 other high-income countries.

Biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) receive 12 years of guaranteed protection from biosimilar competition compared with 5 years of protection from generic competition for new small-molecule drugs. Under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, biologics are exempt from selection for Medicare price negotiation for 11 years compared with 7 years for small-molecule drugs. Congress codified these differing legal protections on the premise that biologics require more time and resources to develop and have weaker patent protection, necessitating additional protections for manufacturers to recoup their development costs and generate adequate returns on investment.